Jump to content


Photo

Palm Tree


  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

#1 Lauderlover

Lauderlover

    Lauderlover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 04:30 PM

If anyone happened to pick up an extra Palm Tree at the convention, please let me know, I"d love one! I know Lisa's are already spoken for! [New Laugh]

#2 Liliane

Liliane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 06:16 PM

Hi Lauderlover

There is the first one with "Buy It Now" on eBey [Big Grin] [Big Grin] really very fast [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

http://cgi.ebay.com/...77&category=602

#3 Lauderlover

Lauderlover

    Lauderlover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts

Posted 18 May 2003 - 12:02 AM

Thanks! I saw that! But I was hoping to pick one up for the retail price! [Big Grin] Does anyone know how much the Palm Tree retailed for?

#4 Liliane

Liliane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 01:52 PM

I am not surely however someone said to me inclusive taxes $ 188. - -

#5 Lauderlover

Lauderlover

    Lauderlover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts

Posted 18 May 2003 - 02:36 PM

Thanks Lilian! They just keep climbing higher and higher! [Eek!]

#6 Lisa

Lisa

    2000 Post Member

  • Admin
  • 2,990 posts

Posted 18 May 2003 - 09:46 PM

The price of the shimmering oasis- aka palm tree is $175.00. [Wink]

[ May 18, 2003, 10:39 PM: Message edited by: Lisa ]

#7 klassicguy1

klassicguy1

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 560 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 08:04 AM

Does everyone know that the Palm TRee solid has a new type of magnetic closure? I had not heard that before. It works very well but is different.

#8 Lisa

Lisa

    2000 Post Member

  • Admin
  • 2,990 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 09:02 AM

Yes, all of the new solids have the magnetic closure.

Did those of you who have the palm tree see that the pink stones around the base are not there as in the original photo? [Confused]

[ May 20, 2003, 01:56 PM: Message edited by: Lisa ]

#9 Maeuschen

Maeuschen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 239 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 04:03 PM

Hi Lisa !
In the original photo the blue stones are different too !!
The new one has only one line with blue stones.
In the older picture you can see some double stones round there.

Greetings !

Michaela

#10 Debbie

Debbie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 145 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 07:19 PM

Everyone,
the palm tree has arrived in the las vegas store...hurry and call today..I have my in route. [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Razz] [Smile]

#11 Lisa

Lisa

    2000 Post Member

  • Admin
  • 2,990 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 09:40 PM

Yes, I got a call too, they will only let you order 1 per person. [Suspicious]

#12 Lisa

Lisa

    2000 Post Member

  • Admin
  • 2,990 posts

Posted 21 May 2003 - 11:10 PM

Here is the side by side comparison of the proposed solid and actual.
user posted image user posted image

#13 favoritegram

favoritegram

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 150 posts

Posted 21 May 2003 - 11:44 PM

Lisa, In looking at the 2 pictures it appears there ae many differences. The bottle looks like a different color, The green stones in the tree look different. I have not seen it in person but it looks like the prototype is nicer. [Eek!] Lainey

#14 Maeuschen

Maeuschen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 239 posts

Posted 22 May 2003 - 12:02 AM

Hi !
I agree with Lainey the prototype looks much nicer.
Blue coloured stones on the leaves [Confused]
and the blue stones at the bottom are extreme
shocking blue [Puzzled] b‰hhhhh.
I don't know what I have to think about. Why does Estee Lauder changes the solids when they are looking good [Confused] .

Greetings !

Michaela

#15 Lisa

Lisa

    2000 Post Member

  • Admin
  • 2,990 posts

Posted 21 May 2003 - 01:35 PM

I do!! Production with less stones is less expensive!! [Suspicious]

[ May 21, 2003, 02:28 PM: Message edited by: Lisa ]




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users